Mr. Digvijay Singh, act first, then propagate

By

Abdul Hannan Siwani Nadvi

Mr. Digvijay Singh is a senior leader of congress party. He has been the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh.

He knows very well about political world. He is aware about ups and downs of country's political environment.

This time, he has declared all-out political war against RSS and its sister organizations. BJP and RSS leaders have slapped various charges on him, but, his exposure against Hindutva houses remains to continue.

A section in Muslim community hails his brave exposure and figures him a brave leader in congress party.

In his latest exposure, he blamed on RSS for defaming Muslims in the country. Addressing a rally of Samajik Chetna Manch Ghosi Yadav Mahasabha, in UP, he says that RSS engineered bomb blasts to defame Muslims.

His earlier various revelations against Hindutva outfits figured him a good leader in Muslim community.

Eventually, he is a general secretary of congress party. He has been given a position to bring congress party back in power where it failed to achieve goals in various states in past many years. After re-capturing on all previous positions in various states, congress party's eyes are on the next assembly election to be held in UP next year. So, the platform is being prepared to appease Muslims.

Mr. Digvijay Singh how much is sincere in his claims against Hindtuva outfits, I do not know, however, his periodically exposures and none-response by police, congress party and NIA revels that his exposure just only a political stunt, nothing except of that.

I really failed to understand the intention of Mr. Singh's claim against Hindtuva organizations. What he wants to establish from his exposure on different places.

Mr. Digvijay Singh might forget that all Hindutva organizations, including the organizations which are involved in terror activities throughout the country and the organizations were involved in razing Babri Masjid down and carried out the genocide in Gujarat in 2002, raised and extended its wings, in all over the country, during the governments of congress party, which is governing in center since independence.

When RSS and its sister organizations were very small and their contacts and activists were not in millions, central or state government has done nothing against them, so, now, when they have become a power in the country, how central or state government or police would take action against them.

What Mr. Digvijay Singh is claiming, Muslims have been stating since last many decades. Mr. Singh's claim that RSS is doing this one and that one will never change the reality on the ground.

If RSS is making bombs, using Muslim names to defame Muslim community, if RSS leaders are involved in terrorist activities, so, it is the responsibility of police and government to take action against them. Looking towards country's political situation, there is no hope that police and security agencies will take any step against them in near future. Because these are nationalists forces, as well as, they are our own people, as we heard many times the same statement from some leaders.

It would be better for Mr. Singh to register a case in police station and take down the names of all leaders and organizations who are involved in waging the war against the country. Because the action that is being taken through proper channel could deliver its good results instead of proclaiming in public meetings.

Mr. Digvijay Singh knows the importance if the action taken through legal channels. His party in center for last many years, it is said that Mr. Manmohan Singh is the Prime Minister for the nation, while reins of power in the hand of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi. Why Mr. Singh does not put the issue before Sonia Gandhi and ask her to take action.

Prime Minister has made it clear that all bag eggs who are involved in corruptions, to be booked quickly, irrespective of their position and status. So, it is better opportunity for Mr. Singh to put all evidences, reports, images, maps, names and other details before Prime Minister and Mrs. Sonia Gandhi to take all necessary actions to prevent the country from going into bad hands.

Indeed, what Mr. Singh is exposing time to time, the world knows it very well. Police and security agencies have all information on what is happening in the country. There is need of political will to take action against them.

Muslims have been lessening from long times that this organization is doing this one and that one, while the action taken against Muslim organization and Muslim youths only, having information of their no link with anti-national activities.

Indian jails, where various Muslim youths are languishing in terror charges, are the witness of indiscriminating and injustice with Muslims. Mr. Singh always claims about RSS, did he raise the issue of innocent Muslim youths languishing in prison and waiting for justice in the meetings held by congress party to look the atmosphere of the country?

Just claiming or blaming cannot threw any result unless the action not taken firmly.

There is a question if RSS and its sister organizations are carrying out these things, as Mr. Singh claims, so why security agencies are not taking any step against them?

Who will take the action against them; ordinary people or civil society or media houses? At the time of arrest of Muslim youths, as well as, slapping the charges against Muslim organizations no commission setup, no enquiry has made. Just police conducted raid in Muslim areas, arrested some Muslim youths, declared that all terror masterminds have been arrested and then media approved how they got training in Pakistan, and at final it made cleared that all terror cases have been solved. Then why the same tactic is not being used in this case, while the person who is claming these conspiracies is not an ordinary man. He is Mr. Digvijay Singh, the general secretary of Indian National Congress party.

Various decisions, for the sake of the country, have been made by Congress led-UPA government during its role at center since last many years. Even UPA government has declared all-out war against corruptions, then why it is hesitating in going against the organizations which are involved in destabilizing the country's unity and integrity which is more dangerous than the corruption.

One thing I want to make clear to Mr. Singh that what RSS is doing, Muslims have no relation with that. It carries out the bomb blasts or makes conspiracy against the country; it is not the duty of Muslims to discuss on that point. It is the duty of country's law enforcer agencies to look which organization or people or individuals are involved in which kind of activities.

Mr. Singh's statements seem a political stunt and it is an effort to convince Muslims how congress is serious about them. It is better for Mr. Singh to use another stunt to convince Muslims.

My intention is very clear, if Mr. Singh has power to establish his claims so he has to use proper channel so that RSS and other Hindu right wing organizations to be put before the court and they get the punishment over their involvement in terror activities, otherwise, it is better for Mr. Sing to keep his mouth shut on such issues and don't try to exploit Muslim community by un-necessary statements and¬ revelations, because the statements contradict with the action might perish his position in Muslim community and could serve no benefit for congress party too.

18-05-2011

Mr. Khushwant Singh, don’t lecture us about Muslim women and Islam

By

Abdul Hannan Siwani Nadvi

Lecturing Muslims, targeting Islamic Sharia, and making scoff at Muslims and their lifestyle has become a fashion of this era. Everyone wants to kill Muslims. Everyone wants to damage the image of Muslims and Islam.


There are hundreds of thousands of organizations, sites, educated personalities, volunteers, workers and activists whose work is only to put always Muslims and Islam on target.


They are being paid for this work, and sometimes they have been awarded in open ceremony by Weston and European countries.


Indeed, Islam and Muslims is under attack from all corners. Military operations led by United States are under way in most Muslim countries. Cultural and educational hatred campaign against Muslims and Islam is being carried out by so-called educated and contractors of democracy in non-Muslim world.


Someone is making cartoons on Prophet Mohammad (Sallallaho Alaihe wasallam), someone is supporting bans on veil, and someone is burning the Qura'an and destroying Masjids. It seems, it is all-out war against Muslims, Islam and their messenger.


Mr. Khushwant Singh is also one of them. He is known as an educated and prominent writer but his thoughts and thinking is very ridiculous. His thoughts about Burqa and Muslims show that he is still away from the real sprite of knowledge.


Mr. Khushwant Singh in his article published in Hindustan Times on April 30, 2011, says lot of things about Burqa. He seeks a Fatwa from Darul Uloom (Deoband) for abolishing Hijab, such as, he wants a Fatwa from Azhar University to support French government's decision slapping ban on veil, and even he prays for returning of Kamal Ata Turk who had banned veil in Turkey. He says Turkey is the most advanced Muslim country because it had banned Burqa. According to him, lower middle class is only use Naqab or veil etc.


According to him, abolishing of Burqa is a sign of advancement and wearing of Burqa is a sign of ignorant.


Reading his article about Burqa, I had been thinking how a person who has written various books and has a place in all classes in the country can discuss such kind of ridiculous and ludicrous ideology.


Mr. Khushwant Singh; or anyone has no right to lecture Muslims, or interfere in Islamic Sharia. Who allowed him, or them to do so?


Is this his not double standard? He demands ban on Burqa, while the people of his community had been expressing its concerns when the Turban was banned in America after 9/11.


Traditions of other communities are respectable, but, traditions of Islam and Muslims are not acceptable; why? Nuns in Christians use special dress that covers her body from head to toe. Is this not an old tradition? Why no one raises the voice to ban on Christian veil?


It is very old tradition in Hindus where Hindu women cover her face with their sari. Are these things not ridiculous and anti-advancement?


All communities in the world can practice according to their tradition and religion; if Muslims do same thing, so it is called an un-civilized exercise. What nonsense is?


What Muslims or Muslim women do or not to do, it is not related to anyone. Who gave the right to such people to blame on Muslims and make scoff at Muslim women for wearing Burqa?


Why he, or others, like him, has objection over Islamic traditions? Why he wants Fawat from Deoband and Azhar University to abolish wearing veil?


They scream seeing Burqa clad women; while they keep their mouth shut when Muslim women demand justice and equality.


What he and others, like him, did for the justice of women who have been subjected of rape in Gujarat in 2002? Why he does not raise the voice for punishing to those who destroyed the dignity of women?


Such kind of people knows only blaming and targeting of Islam, because it brings fame, money and attention of world. This kind of thoughts confirms awards for him and for others, like him.


How he can compare wearing of Burqa with retrogression, while Sikh men too use Turban and spot beard as a religious tradition, so, is it mean; the Sikh men use Turban are uneducated?


How a veil can become a symbol of retrogression. The women in France, who are insisting on wearing veil and using it in their daily life, are most educated women and they are aware about all ups and downs of the society.


These women, who had been called educated and civilized before Islam; turned to a threat to country, as embracing of Islam; what nonsense is.


In India, wife of elder brother enough to all younger brothers in a family, Why Mr. Khushwant Singh and others, like him, do not raise against such inhuman practice?


There are hundreds and thousands of women in other religions where they have been subjected of rape, live like animals, and face every kind of harassments by their own husbands, brothers and family members; why he does not say about them, about their culture and traditions?


The situation of none-Muslim women is more dangerous than Burqa clad women. Rape of sister by father or brother called incest sex. Is it not true? Then, how Mr. Khushwant Singh, or others, like him, can lecture us?


In a culture where women as a prostitute is acceptable and where everyone figures them a tool of sex and does it too, how this culture can accept burqa clad women who cover their body and protect their dignity from the people who figure them just a sex machine.


When Ulema, Muslim scholars, and Muslim countries raise no objection over dress, traditions and prayer of non-Muslims, then why, and, how people from different religions advise and lecture Muslims on what they should do, or not to do?


It is better for Mr. Khushwant Singh not to write anything about Muslim women, as well as, keep himself away from interfering in Islamic Sharia. If he is very keen in writing about the conditions of women, so he is free in writing about the women, who belong to other communities, except Muslim. Or, if he wants to write something about Islam and Muslim women, so, first, he must study Islamic Sharia, rules and Islamic teachings before passing any comment about Muslim women or Islam.


04-11-2011

The world hates Osama; but, why?

By

Abdul Hannan Siwani Nadvi

Osama is no more in the world. He has been killed in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in an attack led by special American unit that was trained for that work, as US claims.


It was greatest and historical moment for some parts of the world when they heard Obama's statement that Osama Bin Ladin has killed and justice has been done.


The world celebrated his killing and it now feels more secure and safe. The world has no reason to know why; when; and how he killed?


A few section expressed its concern over killing of this person, who was most dreaded person in the annals of terrorism; as it is claimed.


It is true; a few love him and most hate him. Those, who love him, have reasons, and those, who hate him, have evidences and proofs that establish his crime.


His thought and opinion whether it was wrong or right, the world has to decide it; what it thinks about it. However, there is a question; we hate Osama, but why?


US claims Osama is behind the 9/11 attacks, it is another thing various American writers and social activists still see doubts in Osama's hand in 9/11 attack. The world also is waiting evidences that establish Osama's role in this attack. There was one option to reveal the truth, Osama to be presented before the court where evidences reveal how he prepared himself for this attack.


Former Afghan government led by Taliban sought evidences from US of Osama's involvement that were later rejected by Bush administration, and finally, it came under US attack which is still hunting Taliban in Afghanistan.


The world, however, accepted Osama's involvement, not because Osama was involved, but because US claimed that Osama was behind the attack.


There is another question; killing of Osama by American forces, celebrating of Americans over his assassination and offering congratulations by US to his own people over this great job is understandable. Because Osama had attacked on America; he had killed Americans; so America killed him. But; why entire world celebrated over his assassination; why people fear to express his opinion in support of him?


The reason is very clear; because, the God of world might be anger. US could cancel the aid which it gives to various countries. US could slap sanctions because they supported terrorists. So, everything was possible. So, why various countries will handover themselves into trouble; they know very well that supporting of Osama cannot bring any advantages for them, while supporting of US can bring more US aid in their countries.


We hate Osama because he selected wrong path; as people say. He killed civilians; as US claims. There is a question. Who did not use the violence?


In every country, we could find leaders who used violence and killed thousands of civilians just for political reasons.


The world knows very well who used violence as a weapon to extend its wings across the world.


Osama was not only the merchant of death. Every society has thousands merchants of death in the garb of politicians, reformists, and so on.


The world, which is celebrating of killing of one person, never expressed its concern over killing of millions ordinary people, who either have been murdered by US air strike or died in hospitals due to serious injuries and those who escaped from dying, are facing brutal dilemma in their life.


No one asked from US how many terrorists have been killed, while thousands of civilians beheaded in drone attacks in tribal areas of Pakistan.


Thousands of civilians had been killed in terrorist attacks of LTTE in Sri Lanka since 1980s to May 1999.


According to a report, “the LTTE is notorious for having pioneered the suicide bomb jacket, as well as the use of women in suicide attacks. They are blamed for a dozen high-level assassinations, over two hundred suicide attacks, and its war against the government has cost more than seventy thousand lives” (http://www.cfr.org/terrorist-organizations)


But, no any drone had been sent to Sri Lanka to kill Parbhakaran. And he was not most wanted person in the world. The reason is very clear; US didn't call him a dangerous person, so why world will say that he is most dangerous person in the world?


These things show; what Osama did is not important before the world. The most important thing is who called Osama a terrorist.


If millions killed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, Somalia, Chechnya, so what happened. Their killing is not more important. The important is the relation between US and other countries.


Most countries in the world get millions dollars as an aid every year from US, so why they will wish to speak against killing of civilians; while supporting of US and being the part of its allies in killing civilians; might increase more aid and favor from US.


Few decades ago, when Afghans were fighting with Soviets in their homeland; US called them Mujahid; US supported them and Osama too; at that time Osama and his colleagues were Mujahid because US had claiming; and what US said how world can refuse it. So, Osama was a Mujahid in entire world. But, few decades later, the situation changed completely.


This time, Osama is not a Mujahid, He is a terrorist, because US says; how world can refuse it, so, he is a terrorist in entire glob; because US says.


I think; who are terrorists and who are not; the world has no relation with them. The most important thing, who called them a terrorist?


US says Osama is a terrorist, so, he is a terrorist for all of us and that's it.


15-05-2011